SC chief signs cooperation pact with Guam, Palau and Northern Mariana Islands
MANILA,
Nov. 6 (PNA) -- The relationship of the Supreme Court (SC) with its
counterparts in three United States territories was strengthened on
Thursday.
SC
Chief Justice Reynato Puno on Thursday signed separate cooperation
agreements with the heads of the judiciary of Guam, Palau and the
Northern Mariana Islands, respectively, at the Dignitaries Lounge, New
SC Building, Padre Faura, Manila.
The
other signatories are Chief Justice Robert Torres, Jr. of the Judiciary
of Guam, Chief Justice Arthur Ngiraklsong of the SC of the Republic of
Palau and Chief Justice Miguel Demapan of the SC of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
Each
agreement is aimed at establishing a Framework Agreement with the
Philippine Judiciary for collaboration between their respective judges
and justices.
Highlighted
were the importance of sharing experiences and cooperation and carrying
out joint activities between the courts of the signatory-countries.
All the agreements provide for the following:
First,
the establishment of a general Framework Agreement for collaboration on
the regulation of mutual knowledge and sharing activities carried out
within the scope of the agreement be directed to exchanging experiences
among Judges and Justices of the two jurisdictions as well as judicial
training, education and documentation, in addition to electronic
linkage between judicial and legal information sites with a view to
facilitate the acquisition of sufficient knowledge on legal and
judicial systems by members of the SCs of the two jurisdictions.
Also,
the improvement of national and international instruments of judicial
cooperation, in addition to holding seminars and conferences on issues
of international nature that relate to the common interests of the
Parties;
Second,
the establishment of a plan of action with programs, projects and
activities they consider appropriate, which shall consist of study
visits for Judges and Justices of one jurisdiction to another, seminars
on subjects of specific interest to both Parties, consultancies,
meetings between the heads of judicial training institutes or academies
in both jurisdictions, and workshops held for Judges and Justices of
other jurisdictions, as well as activities which involve joint research
projects, publications and studies which may contribute to the
improvement of knowledge of the judges and justices of the
signatory-countries;
Third,
the establishment of a plan of action with programs, projects and
activities they consider appropriate for the capacity building and
development training of members of the Judicial Staffs of both
jurisdictions;
Fourth,
the determination of the action plan, if appropriate, of the personal
and material resources required, as well as the undertakings of each
Party;
Fifth,
the collaboration of both Parties on those programs of cooperation in
the justice sector which are enshrined in the areas defined by this
agreement;
Sixth,
the funding of programs and activities carried out under the terms of
this Agreement shall be decided by the Parties according to each case,
with the Parties' prior approval of the respective financial
contributions allocated;
Seventh,
that each signatory-country shall control the funds it allocates for
the activities planned under the terms of this Agreement;
Eight,
the creation of a joint committee composed of three members each of
both respective judiciaries who shall meet as frequently as they deem
appropriate, for the purpose of examining the results of their
cooperation, as well as establishing the action plans stipulated in
Clause Two, their means of execution and the resources required to
implement them.
The
joint committee shall appoint an Executive Committee, composed of two
experts, whose functions shall be to propose the specific development
of the planned program of training activities, monitor and carry out
said activities, and propose the requisite amendments in the
development of planned training activities;
Ninth,
to execute the agreement, the signatories may be be assisted by other
bodies, entities and institutions, either public or private, relating
to the programs and activities and whose collaboration is considered to
be necessary.
Finally,
the participating judiciaries may publish and divulge as they consider
appropriate, the results of the activities developed within the
framework of the present Agreement. (PNA)
|